The Riparian Buffer
Zone Policy for Managing Freshwater Bodies in Ghana is now ready for
implementation and was launched in Accra, on Wednesday May 7th, 2014.
Its overall objective is to ensure that all designated buffer zones along
rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs and other water bodies shall be sustainably
managed for the mutual benefit of all users.
The launch of the long
over due Policy is the climax of the 10 year formulation process, which was
started in 2004 by the Ministry of Water Resources, Works and Housing in
collaboration with the Water Resources Commission (WRC) and other stakeholder
interest agencies including the Town and Country Planning Department (TCPD),
Volta River Authority (VRA), Forest Services Division (FSD), Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the National House of Chiefs as well as civil society
groups.
The Deputy Minister for
Water Resources, Works and Housing, Vincent Oppong Asamoah, who launched the
document on behalf of Minister Collins Duada, described the Policy as “…an
additional major output and working tool for the management of our water
resources.” He noted that the use of natural buffer zones, “to protect
freshwater resources from degradation and pollution was strategic as riparian
buffers provide a wide range of environmental, economic and social benefits
including stabilising stream banks, storing flood waters and maintaining good
water quality…”
Mr. Asamoah was however
concerned about the challenge of how to make the outlined policy decisions
practically workable particularly within the national and district level
integrated planning. His concern bordered on the fact that even though water
resources management and spatial development are closely linked, beneficiaries
like municipalities and property developers are often unwilling to contribute
to the cost of water management such as creation of buffers. The Deputy Minister
admitted: “the needs are real and the challenges enormous,” adding, “but we
will be equal to the task if we coordinate our efforts better by complementing
our strengths and comparative advantages… for the policy to be meaningfully
implemented.”
Commenting on the
Policy Document, the Chairman for the launch ceremony, Nana Agyewodin Professor
Adu Gyamfi Ampem, pointed out that “the essential thing is the realistic
involvement of all stakeholders in meaningful dialoguing as a contribution to
the Policy’s implementation process.
Nana Agyewodin, who is the Board Chairman of the WRC and Chief of
Akyerensua in the Brong-Ahafo Region, deplored the attitude of disregard of
most Ghanaians for polices and directives. This, he said, was evident in the reckless
exploitation of natural resources especially by “galamsey” or illegal miners,
and stressed that “if steps are not taken to check galamsey, water scarcity
will become frightening in Greater Accra and Easter regions,” in the nearest future.”
Objectives of the
Policy
The 35 page Policy
document has been designed to provide comprehensive measures and actions to
guide the coordinated creation of vegetative buffers for the preservation and
functioning of the country’s water bodies and vital ecosystems. These measures and actions are outlined in
specific strategies for five identified areas – maintaining the ecosystem
functions of buffer zones; sustaining the multi-functionality of buffer zones;
riparian buffer zones specific to urban and peri-urban areas; building capacity
through research and education, training and empowerment of communities on
conservation of buffer zones; and coordinating and harmonizing policies,
bye-laws and traditional practices on buffer zones among government
institutions and other involved parties.
Recommended Standard
Buffer Widths
The Policy has
recommended standard widths for riparian buffer zones. The standard widths are 60 to 90 meters
shoreline protection for municipal reservoirs such as the Weija Dam and Lake
Bosomtwe; 10 to 60 meters for major perennial rivers and streams including the
Volta, Tano and Offin; 10 to 20 meters for minor perennial streams; 10 to 15
meters for important seasonal streams; 10 to 50 meters for streams within
forest reserves; and 30 meters around the perimeter of wetlands as defined from
the high water elevation.
These recommended
standard widths either tie in with or slightly vary from existing widths for
buffer zone protection arrangements of relevant institutions, which are also
captured in the Policy document. They
include the FSD, whose buffer zone arrangement has to do the prohibition of
logging within 50 meters of major streams and 25 meters along smaller streams;
the Wildlife Division, whose buffer zone arrangement provides a three-tier
concept for the core, support and management zones without specified widths;
and the TCPD that provides for a no-development buffer zone area of 300 meters
wide between a water body and the development area.
The others are the
Ministry of Lands, Forestry and Mines, which has instituted that a minimum of
100 meters off the water mark should be declared as protected areas; the Ghana
Water Company Limited specifically for the Weija Dam, establishing
approximately 15 meters contour line above the mean sea level as the Dam’s
buffer area; and the Hydrological Services Department, that has specified
between 10 to 30 meters along both banks of major drains and water courses in
Accra and Tema metropolitan areas.
According to the Policy
document there are no well documented or clearly defined buffer zone
arrangements for other some institutions and stakeholders including the VRA,
EPA, Water Management Units of the Ministry of Food and Agriculture, relevant
NGOs and local communities.
Co-ordination
To ensure a well
co-ordinated implementation of the Policy at all levels, it has specified roles
for major stakeholder groups such as government departments and agencies – who
will be mainly responsible for preparing plans for the management, monitoring
and evaluation of all existing and proposed buffer zones; Metropolitan, Municipal
and District Assemblies will establish,
where appropriate, specific bye-laws declaring
buffer zones as protected areas to ensure conservation of unique
riparian areas including sacred groves and stream beds; and Traditional rulers
will facilitate the establishment and
long-term management of buffer zones on communal lands that should
evolve into full community ownership.
The Policy acknowledges
the different roles of men and women as crucial for the very survival of buffer
habitats. It has therefore stated that conservation and management activities
in buffer zones will be pursued through a gender equitable perspective.
Precautions
The Policy seems to be
diplomatic about construction and commercial activities, logging and
harvesting, and farming practices in riparian buffer zones. It does not prohibit such activities, but
enjoins that “streams and other areas within the riparian buffer zone shall be
left in stable conditions upon completion of development activities…” The
Policy however, mandates government agencies to make regulations that may
restrict development activities in buffer zones.
It highlights the
distances that water pollution hazards must be kept back from buffer zones. For
instance, storage of hazardous substances must be 45 meters away; raised septic
systems should be 75 meters away and solid waste land fills should be 90 meters
away from all riparian buffer zones.
Functions of Buffer
Zones
In the context of this
Policy, buffer zones refers to created physical areas that separate two
ecological systems, an ecological system from other land uses or that which
border a water body. Its functions
include natural or ecological and human or socio-economic services.
Ecologically, aside
contributing substantially to water availability, riparian buffer zones help to
prevent soil erosion, provide cooling effect within a local climatic area, act
as connecting corridors for wildlife to move safely from one habitat to the
other, and serve as carbon sinks and thus help to reduce emission of green
house gases (GHS) – a major cause of
global warming that contributes to climate change.
The socio-economic
functions of riparian buffers include providing indigenous plants of diverse
species traditionally harvested for medicines and building materials, filters
impurities from water and thereby provides clean water for local communities,
support the fishing industry of local communities and serve as grazing and
watering areas for livestock particularly in the dry season.
Challenges
The Policy has been
introduced at a time when lots of challenges confront conservation efforts. For
instance, the built-up of areas within riparian zones through housing,
construction and commercial activities weakens the feasibility of establishing
buffer zones. The Densu Delta and now Sakumo Ramsar sites are typical examples
of areas where considerations for the functioning of natural ecosystems have
been discarded in favour of human activities that undermine long term
livelihood sustainability. Then, there
is also the issue of the destruction of riparian vegetation closely linked with
poverty and population pressure.
In this context, the
Policy calls for the introduction and in some instances, the re-establishment
of buffer zones, to be considered as an integral part of the general
socio-economic development process, which needs equal support to make the
policy implementable.
Effective Date of the
Policy
According
to the Acting Executive Secretary of the Water Resources Commission, Ben Yaw
Ampomah, the Riparian Buffer Zone Policy comes into effect retrospectively in
December 2012, when Parliament passed it into a legal instrument.
The
effective implementation of the Riparian Buffer Zone Policy will advance the
attainment of the goals of water resources management related projects such as
the Water Infrastructure Solutions from Ecosystem Services underpinning Climate
Resilient Policies and Programmes also known as WISE – UP to Climate. It is a
global partnership aimed at demonstrating that natural ecosystems or infrastructure
are nature based solutions for climate change adaptation and sustainable
development. The essence of the demonstration is that without healthy
ecosystems in well functioning watersheds, the infrastructure built for
irrigation, hydropower or water supply may not function sustainably, let alone
achieve the economic returns necessary to justify investments made.
(This item has already been published in the Ghanaian Times and Public Agenda)
No comments:
Post a Comment