| Maama Akua Fabiah of Jema recalling life in the past when most of their water, food, medicines came from the forests |
| Women of Jema fetching water "Kokwa," a vibrant flowing natural cascade now reduced to a sluggish stream that was surrounded by a dense forest now turn to bush due to farming and logging. |
Benefits from Forests
for Dependent Communities
In addition to produce from their farms, the
forests served as reliable sources of food supplement providing – bushmeat,
snails, wild yam, mushrooms and other assorted wild vegetables, legumes
as
well as medicines among other things.
Jema also used to be a cocoa growing area that even had a cocoa shed.
Now in her old age,
Maame admits that things have changed – “some for good, some for worse.” “For example, electricity is good, we can now
store meat and cooked food in our refrigerators, enjoy iced water and even watch
TV,” she says. Maame believes life will
however never be the same again with the depletion of the forests. “We no longer enjoy mushrooms, snails, wild
yams, even “ase,” (a kind of wild legumes)
which we used to kill our hunger during the lean season, is now scarce,”
adding, “so inspite of all the modern changes including the health centre,
which we do appreciate, life is now very tough because our forests are gone
forever.”
Nations are equally
worried about the current status of forests worldwide and its negative impacts
on the livelihoods of the people and development in general. So over the years
individual and collective efforts have been made to restore degraded forests. But in most instances, planted forests are
unable to provide the same services that original forests provided.
The ROAM Approach
However, there
is optimism that this issue of restoring the integrity of degraded forests and
lands can be resolved, thanks to a unique land restoration initiative developed
by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the World
Resources Institute (WRI). Known as Restoration Opportunities Assessment
Methodology (ROAM), it will help countries understand how much of their land
offers restoration opportunities, map where those opportunities are and
determine which degraded landscapes offer the most value to society.
This means that
the initiative, which is not a project, but rather a published hand book
titled, “Assessing Forest Landscape Restoration Opportunities at the National
Level,” will enable countries to undertake targeted and focused re-forestation,
instead of the haphazard approach that often characterizes reforestation
efforts. The handbook provides
countries around the world with new guidance on assessing their national
restoration potential.
In other words, the handbook is an illustration for reforestation that
goes beyond mere tree-planting exercises. It enables interested users to among
other things, identify places where such activity may be the most socially,
economically or ecologically feasible; and to estimate the associated costs as
well as the numerous benefits restoration can provide at those sites – from
improved livelihoods to cleaner water or conserved soils. ROAM is also expected
to help provide preliminary information on how planners can go about
restoration, including analysis of which type of restoration activities would
be most suitable.
ROAM and the Bonn
Challenge
The ROAM approach to forest land restoration also provides a boost to the
global
movement to restore 150 million hectares of degraded and deforested land by
2020 – known as the “Bonn Challenge.” It
was established at a ministerial roundtable in September 2011 at the invitation
of the German Government and IUCN.
The “Bonn
Challenge” is an implementation platform for existing international
commitments. Specifically, it seeks to accelerate early action on Reducing
Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) under the UN
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC); speed up action towards
achieving the Aichi Biodiversity Target 15 on restoration of at least 15 per
cent of the world’s degraded ecosystems by 2020; and advance attainment of the
international goals related to combating desertification and land degradation.
The
importance of the “Bonn Challenge,” is reflected in the actual net benefit to
both national and local economies. Touching on this point, Stewart Maginnis said, “restoring 150 million hectares over the
next 10 years could potentially close the ‘emissions gap’ by 11-17% and inject
more than US$ 80 billion per year into local and national economies.”
Several
governments, private sector companies and community groups have signalled their
intent to align with and invest in achieving the Bonn Challenge. They are
India, USA, Rwanda and the Brazilian Mata Atlantica Restoration Pact; and
lately, Costa Rica and El Salvador.
ROAM and
the GPFLR
ROAM was further developed to promote the goals of the
Global Partnership on Forest Landscape Restoration (GPFLR), which also supports
the “Bonn Challenge.” The GPFLR is a worldwide network that unites
restoration practitioners, policy-makers and supporters from government,
international and nongovernmental organizations, businesses and individuals
with a common cause. The GPFLR mobilizes expert support and increased capacity
to implement forest landscape restoration, builds support for restoration with
decision-makers at both the local and international level, and influences
legal, political and institutional frameworks to support forest landscape
restoration.
Essentially, both ROAM and the “Bonn Challenge” compliment
each other and have been packaged to enhance not just the environment, but the
social, cultural and economic well-being of the people. While the “Bonn
Challenge” will ensure the commitment of degraded forest lands for reforestation,
ROAM will facilitate the regeneration of the ecological
integrity of degraded forest lands, to enable them perform their natural life
supporting functions.
Additionally,
both initiatives are about forest landscape
restoration, now widely
recognized as an important means of not only restoring ecological integrity,
but also generating in the long term additional local-to-global benefits by
boosting livelihoods, economies, food and fuel production, water security and
climate change adaptation and mitigation.
Conclusion
Moreover,
attaining the objectives of the two initiatives involve a process that is about
“forests” because it involves increasing the number and/or health of trees in
an area. It is about “landscapes” because it involves entire watersheds,
administrative areas or even countries in which many land uses interact. It is
about “restoration” because it involves bringing back the biological
productivity of an area in order to achieve any number of benefits for people
and the planet. It is “long-term” because it typically takes many decades for a
forest landscape to recover a full suite of ecological functionalities and
benefits to human well-being, although benefits such as jobs, income and carbon
sequestration begin to flow right away.
No comments:
Post a Comment